- The Washington Times - Thursday, February 26, 2026

China’s initial investments in Syria’s postwar reconstruction could pose serious security risks for the region, advocates say, even as Damascus increasingly turns to the U.S. and Saudi Arabia for its most expensive projects.

China has remained a small-scale economic player in Syria since the fall of the Bashar Assad government, with which it had a long-standing relationship, but has made small steps recently to get in on the ground floor of Syria’s reconstruction efforts.

The Chinese-based GCI Group, which represents 25 firms across various industries, opened an economic office in Chtaura, Lebanon, this month. The office, less than 50 miles from Damascus, will serve as an important diplomatic and logistical hub for Beijing’s operations in Syria, the company’s CEO told reporters this month, and reflects Beijing’s growing, “pragmatic” interest in protecting its existing interests in Syria and expanding its economic influence.



In addition to securing lucrative construction contracts via Damascus, the office hopes to facilitate deals that would bring in Chinese technology companies to build critical infrastructure in Syria.

Notably, analysts say, Chinese tech firms such as Huawei, which have operated semi-covertly in the region for years, are looking to play a leading role in Damascus’ national ID initiative and server development.

Both projects could give Beijing significant influence over Syria’s digital infrastructure and potentially pose serious cybersecurity risks to the country.

Syria doesn’t want this information and these databases to be under the control of other people. We want to have access for future analysis and understanding of the demographic and situation in Syria,” said Wael Demyati, director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, an advocacy organization in Damascus. “Our Syrian future should be based on transparency, on correct data, correct information, which happens only with the correct partner.”

Syria has relied mostly on regional partners for much of its early reconstruction funding. Earlier this month, Syria signed a multibillion-dollar investment deal with Saudi Arabia that covers nearly 50 projects, including real estate development and international telecommunications networks.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Syria signed a $7 billion investment deal with Turkey last year to develop the country’s energy infrastructure.

These deals are in the early phases, and Damascus could be vulnerable to Chinese economic influence if the projects are not realized.

“As long as Damascus is able to realize the financial commitments and reconstruction pledges made by Gulf states, it is unlikely to turn to Chinese firms for large-scale infrastructure projects in the short term,” said Ahmad Sharawi, a senior research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “If Gulf commitments stall or fail to materialize at scale, Beijing may see an opportunity to enter the market and compete particularly in infrastructure, energy or port development, where Chinese state-backed firms have comparative advantages.”

Syria faces huge rebuilding challenges after a brutal 15-year civil war that has left enduring scars and crumbling infrastructure. Estimates from the World Bank and other international organizations suggest that development projects in the country could cost at least $216 billion, necessitating massive foreign investment.

Damascus’ funding needs partially explain President Ahmad al-Sharaa’s extensive diplomatic tours. The Syrian leader visited and established relations with numerous nations over the past year, including those that supported the Assad regime, such as Russia, which took in the deposed leader when he fled Syria.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mr. al-Sharaa also has strengthened ties with Washington. He became the first Syrian president in decades to visit the United States in November and has maintained a close relationship with President Trump and his representatives in Syria, including Special Envoy Tom Barrack.

Still, U.S. lawmakers and some security experts remain skeptical of Syria’s stability and the intentions of Mr. al-Sharaa’s government.

U.S. investment in Syria was stymied for nearly a year after the fall of the Assad regime as lawmakers debated the repeal of the Caesar Act sanctions that placed heavy economic restrictions on anyone doing business with Syria.

The sanctions were repealed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act in December, but Syria is required to deliver regular reports on its progress on respecting minority rights and fighting terrorism, reflecting the fears of many in Congress.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Other Western investors see Syria’s recent clashes with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces as evidence of the country’s general instability.

The skepticism in the West has given Chinese firms an opening to expand Beijing’s Digital Silk Road, an aspect of China’s Belt and Road Initiative that involves exporting artificial intelligence, 5G networks and fiber-optic cables to developing nations.

Syria officially joined the Belt and Road Initiative in 2022, under the Assad government, but China has yet to launch wide-scale infrastructure investments in the country as it has done in other parts of the world.

Experts say China’s overall investment strategy in the developing world has been exploitative.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“The way China does business is really a kind of economic occupation or economic colonization of countries. It’ll give like unmatched deals, but overall they end up owning the port or owning the town or owning whatever it is that they’re seeking,” said Mouaz Moustafa, executive director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force.

China’s investment initiatives in South America, many security experts say, have created a dangerous atmosphere of dependence for developing nations. Beijing’s heavy investment in telecommunications, energy and transportation infrastructure gives China not only immense leverage over developing nations but also massive surveillance and data-collection opportunities.

“Governments dependent on such infrastructure to support their populations may face coercive threats. The intersection of various critical infrastructure types and the documented coercive tendencies of the PRC’s authoritarian government poses inherent risks,” Maj. Gen. Evan L. Pettus wrote in a 2023 report.

Those risks are especially dangerous as Damascus looks to cement its postwar control over Syria and establish stability. Increased investment from China could bring further skepticism from international firms and further weaken relations with Israel, Syria’s southern neighbor.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The two countries are engaged in negotiations to finalize a disengagement agreement that would reestablish the borders set out in the original 1974 deal.

“If America gets involved in Syria, you will see very soon technology developed in Israel made in a factory by the workers and the people of Syria, funded by capital investment from Saudi Arabia, exported all over the world. And this is really a game-changer for everybody,” Mr. Demyati said.

• Vaughn Cockayne can be reached at vcockayne@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2026 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.