"When the state's one indispensable witness had bipolar disorder and not a toothache or common cold, that fact is material and warrants a new trial," said Paul D. Clement, an attorney arguing on behalf of Mr. Drummond. "Without his testimony, there is no way to get a conviction of murder, let alone the death penalty."
Supreme Court weighs new trial for Richard Glossip, twice-convicted murderer on death row
→
Paul D. Clement, one of the lawyers arguing to eradicate Chevron, said the precedent has led to an overbearing bureaucracy whose decisions ding average citizens.
Supreme Court appears ready to curb deference to executive agencies
→
