"We are deeply gratified by the Sixth Circuit's intensive analysis not only of our case but the state of student First Amendment rights in modern era," said Defending Education President Nicole Neily. "The court's decision — and its many concurrences — articulate the importance of free speech, the limits and perils of public schools claiming to act in loco parentis, and the critical role of persuasion — rather than coercion — in America's public square."
Ohio parents win appeals court decision against school district's anti-misgendering rule
→
"I can think of no better way to honor Charlie's legacy than through ensuring that student voices cannot be silenced by fear or malice," said Ms. Neily in a statement.
Republicans warn colleges against using Charlie Kirk's death to justify anti-speech policies
→
