Clifford D. May examines Mr. Trump’s decision to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities, writing that the president “may have contemplated the risks of inaction” and weighed the question of “what would be required, over the decades ahead, to contain a nuclear-armed regime committed to jihad and increasingly allied with the anti-American dictators in Beijing, Moscow and Pyongyang.”
“Viewed in this light, defanging [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei is unmistakably an ‘America First’ and Make America Great Again policy,” writes Mr. May, who asserts that, “had Mr. Trump decided not to act, I’m convinced the Israelis had a plan to at least degrade Fordo. Such a plan would likely have been high risk, and it probably wouldn’t have set back Tehran’s nuclear program for very long.
“On Monday night, Mr. Trump announced a ceasefire. Maybe it will hold, maybe not. Even if it does, expect Mr. Khamenei to attempt to — you should excuse the expression — build back better,” writes Mr. May, founder and president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and a Threat Status contributor. “If so, the U.S. and Israel have the means to bomb back better. Their leaders have demonstrated that they also have the will.”