- The Washington Times - Updated: 10:56 a.m. on Monday, February 23, 2026

A federal judge blocked former special counsel Jack Smith’s attempt to release a damning anti-Trump report to Congress, ruling Monday that because Mr. Smith was never properly appointed to the job, his attempts to complete the document were done outside of the law.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee to the court in Florida, also ruled that the report contains material that would break the attorney-client privilege if released.

Given that, she said, releasing the information would unfairly taint Mr. Trump who, because he was never brought to trial or convicted, maintains the presumption of innocence.



She issued an order prohibiting the release outside of the Justice Department.

President Donald Trump attends the National Governors Association dinner at the White House, Saturday, Feb. 21, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Allison Robbert)
President Donald Trump attends the National Governors Association dinner at the White House, Saturday, Feb. 21, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Allison Robbert) President Donald Trump attends the National … more >

“The court strains to find a situation in which a former special counsel has released a report after initiating criminal charges that did not result in a finding of guilt, at least not in a situation like this one, where the defendants contested the charges from the outset and still proclaim their innocence,” she wrote.

Her ruling was brutal to Mr. Smith, the controversial special counsel appointed by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland to pursue criminal cases against Mr. Trump in the period between his presidencies.

Mr. Smith won an indictment in Washington accusing the president of attempting to subvert the 2020 election results, and another before Judge Cannon in Florida accusing him of mishandling classified documents.

Mr. Smith was appointed to the special counsel’s office even though at the time he was serving overseas as a prosecutor at The Hague. He has since said he can’t even remember who swore him in as special prosecutor, though he insists he was actually sworn in.

Advertisement
Advertisement

He had never been in a Senate-confirmed position, and his opponents argued that meant he could not be appointed a special prosecutor.

Judge Cannon agreed, and ruled him improperly serving. That decision, she said Monday, taints everything he did — including his rush to complete the anti-Trump report in the days before Mr. Trump’s second inauguration.

She called that a “brazen stratagem” to breach her orders.

“Special Counsel Smith and his team went ahead for months, undeterred, preparing Volume II using discovery collected in connection with this proceeding and expending government funds in the process,” she wrote.

Mr. Trump had asked Judge Cannon to keep the report secret.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Testifying to Congress last month, Mr. Smith defended his behavior as special counsel and renewed his claims that the president is a criminal who escaped conviction only because of the 2024 election.

“I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump,” Mr. Smith said. “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity.”

Democrats have been desperate to get a look at Mr. Smith’s still-secret report, using last month’s hearing to prod Mr. Smith and the committee’s Republicans to try to force its release.

• Stephen Dinan can be reached at sdinan@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2026 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.