WATCH: Lindsey McPherson on the fight over the Epstein files

Video

Monday, November 24, 2025

The political fight over the Epstein files has escalated, with both the House and Senate overwhelmingly voting to force their release. President Trump, after repeatedly dismissing the matter as a Democratic hoax, relented to the inevitable outcome.

Jeffrey Epstein was a wealthy financier who was convicted in 2008 of soliciting prostitution from a minor. He was later indicted in 2019 on much broader federal sex trafficking charges. Lawmakers and Epstein’s victims want the files released so that others involved in the scheme can be exposed and held to account.

Democrats argue President Trump is hiding information that could implicate him, while newly released emails from Epstein’s estate show multiple prominent Democrats remained in contact with him long after his 2008 conviction. Trump, who cut off his association with Epstein before that, has denied wrongdoing and has directed the Justice Department to investigate prominent Democrats who have been named in those emails.

The central questions are how much of this fight is political theater and what the files will actually reveal once they’re made public.

I’m Lindsey McPherson, Capitol Hill Reporter for the Washington Times.

This is our Q&A on the Epstein files.

Why are the Epstein files back in the news?

The Epstein files have been in the news for a while, but are prominently in the news now because of the House and Senate voting to pass a bill that will require the Justice Department to release all its case files related to Jeffrey Epstein. This process has been underway in Congress for months. A bipartisan duo of House members, Ro Khanna of California, who’s a Democrat, and Thomas Massey of Kentucky, who’s a Republican, had filed a discharge petition on this bill to try to get 218 signatures to force a vote on this bill because Republicans did not want to bring it to the floor. And so they had been working for months on that, and they finally got the final signature when Adelita Grijalva was sworn into Congress and became the last signature on the petition.

And it’s also in the news because Trump had been pushing against this effort for months. His White House had actually tried to get lawmakers to take their names off the discharge petition. Trump finally said he would allow House Republicans to support it, so it created this new momentum against some of the Republican resistance over this, and they now are going to be forced to release the files for this new law.

What does the bill call for?

The bill that was passed specifically asks for all of Epstein’s flight logs, his travel records, names of entities and individuals with known or alleged ties to Epstein’s trafficking or financial network, information on immunity deals, or other legal settlements that he may have been involved in, any communications on the Justice Department decision not to bring charges up until they did in 2019, any notes or metadata concerning the destruction or concealment of documents or other evidence. They’re trying to see both who was involved in the sex trafficking scheme, as well as any efforts from the federal government to cover it up in the years that it was not prosecuted. There are some exemptions for the release of files. The bill provides exemptions for child sexual abuse materials, personally identifiable information of the victims, for example. But for the most part, it wants all the files released and unclassified to the degree that any are classified.

What new documents have been released and what do they show?

There have been documents released already because the House Oversight Committee had launched its own investigation into the Epstein files in which they subpoenaed the Justice Department for the files that this bill now mandates they release. And they also subpoenaed Epstein’s estate. So they’ve had a couple of batches of releases, totaling tens of thousands of pages. One batch was from the Justice Department. Those records had a lot of redactions. Lawmakers said that a lot of these were already in the public domain, so they didn’t find a ton of new information. But the emails from the Epstein estate contained some new revelations that I think have been more instructive in the investigation so far, and that’s where all these latest allegations on whether Trump was implicated or Democrats were implicated have been swirling from those emails.

What do the new documents show about Democrats’ ties to Epstein?

The latest release of emails do contain some prominent Democratic names, and Republicans have pointed to some of those as examples that they might have had ties to Epstein that were previously unknown. One that’s come up is Stacey Plaskett. She is the delegate to the U.S. Virgin Islands. So she’s a member of the House, but a non-voting representative. And so she was Epstein’s congresswoman. When he was alive, he owned a private island in the Virgin Islands, and that’s where allegedly a lot of his sex trafficking crimes occurred. She knew him as a constituent, but also he had donated to her campaign. And they were found to be, according to these latest releases of emails, and there were some text messages in there, texting during a 2019 congressional hearing in which she was questioning former Trump fixer, Michael Cohen. So Republicans have pointed to that as suspicious and want to investigate it further. They’ve even tried to censure her on the House floor, but that effort failed. So that’s one example of Democrats’ names coming up in the files.

There was another email that named Hakeem Jeffries, but it was a fundraising solicitation. Jeffries has said he never knew Epstein. The email was from a fundraising firm working on his behalf that mentioned him, but it’s not like he sent it personally. There are other prominent Democrats who have been known for a while to have associations with Epstein at points in time, including former President Bill Clinton and former Obama Economic Advisor Larry Summers. Their names have come up in some of these emails as well and are among people that Trump wants the Justice Department to investigate, as well as Democratic donor Reid Hoffman and other people in Democratic circles.

Watch the video for the full conversation.