OPINION:
A revealing detail in the landmark environmental, social and governance ruling against American Airlines deserves more attention. This case wasn’t brought by conservative activists or Republican state attorneys general; it was brought by the airline’s pilots.
Bryan Spence, an American Airlines pilot, sued his employer because he believed the company’s retirement plan management didn’t align with his values or financial interests. This distinction matters enormously.
For years, the debate over corporate social activism has been framed as a simple collision between liberal stakeholder capitalism and conservative free market principles. However, the American Airlines case reveals a more consequential reality: the fundamental misalignment between corporations’ social positioning and the values of their shareholders, particularly their employees.
Consider the layers of contradiction exposed by this ruling. American Airlines hadn’t even offered ESG investment options in its 401(k) plan; its investment committee had explicitly rejected them. Yet the company was found to have violated its fiduciary duty by failing to maintain sufficient separation between its corporate ESG goals and its pension management. Even more telling, this violation was spotted not by regulators or outside activists but by the employees whose interests the company was supposed to protect.
With President Trump’s inauguration, this case signals a profound shift in how we must think about corporate social activism. The question isn’t simply whether companies should pursue social objectives alongside financial goals. It’s whether they have been pursuing the wrong social objectives entirely, misreading their legal obligations and investors’ values.
This misalignment becomes particularly stark in the context of retirement plans. When BlackRock and other asset managers make proxy voting decisions based on ESG considerations, whose interests are they representing? The evidence from the American Airlines case suggests not the employees whose retirement savings are at stake.
The implications extend far beyond pension management. If employees are willing to sue over misaligned proxy voting in their retirement plans, what other aspects of corporate social activism might face similar challenges? How many other key participants, from customers to shareholders, feel similarly disconnected from the social positions their companies have taken?
The solution isn’t abandoning all consideration of social factors in corporate decision-making. Rather, it’s developing more sophisticated frameworks for ensuring authentic alignment between corporate actions and the priorities of those they serve. This means companies need robust mechanisms for understanding and incorporating their investors’ actual values, not just assumptions about their values. The era of corporate leaders unilaterally deciding their organizations’ social positions is ending.
Also, corporations must establish a clear separation among their various obligations. Social initiatives can continue, but they can’t bleed into fiduciary responsibilities. Investment decisions must be explicitly isolated from broader corporate social goals, particularly in retirement plans.
Most crucially, companies need specialized guidance in navigating this complex landscape. The old model of delegating proxy voting to large asset managers without careful oversight of value alignment is no longer viable.
Companies face stark choices in Mr. Trump’s second term. They can continue balancing competing demands based on presumed values, risking legal exposure and backlash, or they can develop more nuanced, authentic approaches that truly reflect the interests of those to whom they are accountable.
The American Airlines case isn’t about just ESG investing; it’s about the fundamental disconnect between corporate America’s social activism and the values of its investors. As companies navigate an increasingly complex political and legal landscape, bridging this gap becomes a legal and business imperative.
The winners in this era won’t be the companies that abandon social considerations entirely or maintain the status quo of top-down social activism. They will be the organizations that learn to authentically align their actions with the real priorities of their employees, investors and customers while maintaining clear boundaries between social initiatives and fiduciary obligations.
The message from American Airlines’ pilots is clear: Corporate responsibility works only when it represents the people it affects. Corporate America would do well to listen.
• Derek Kreifels is the CEO of Prospr Aligned and is a former assistant state treasurer of Kansas.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.