- Tuesday, April 1, 2025

President Trump has sparked a constitutional debate by suggesting he might find “ways around” term limits and declaring he “would love to run against Barack Obama” for a third term, comments that prompted House Speaker Mike Johnson to publicly reject the possibility. Here’s what you need to know about this growing constitutional controversy:

Trump’s provocative comments

The president has made several remarks suggesting a third term:



The constitutional reality

The 22nd Amendment creates a clear barrier to such ambitions:

  • Limits presidents to two elected terms
  • Ratified in 1951 after FDR’s unprecedented four terms
  • Requires constitutional amendment to change
  • Two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of states needed
  • No serious repeal attempt has ever gained traction
  • Courts have consistently upheld term limits
  • Constitutional scholars emphasize clarity of restriction

GOP leadership response

Advertisement

Republican officials have distanced themselves from the suggestion:

  • Speaker Johnson called the 22nd Amendment “crystal clear”
  • Johnson explicitly rejected notion of Trump serving beyond two terms
  • Stated “we’re not going to be able to change the Constitution”
  • Several Republican senators expressed similar constitutional concerns
  • Tension between party loyalty and constitutional principles evident
  • Focus shifted to accomplishments rather than term extension
  • Conservative legal scholars generally rejecting possibility

Historical context

Presidential term discussions have a complex history:

  • George Washington established two-term precedent voluntarily
  • FDR’s four consecutive terms led to constitutional amendment
  • Reagan supporters briefly explored amendment repeal
  • Clinton occasionally mused about hypothetical third term
  • Obama mentioned abilities if constitutional option existed
  • Grant unsuccessfully sought third non-consecutive term
  • Constitutional debates typically emerge late in second terms
Advertisement

Political implications

The controversy has significant current political dimensions:

  • 2026 midterms approaching with control of Congress at stake
  • Vice President Vance’s political future potentially affected
  • Democratic opponents characterizing comments as authoritarian
  • Conservative constitutionalists expressing concern about precedent
  • Presidential succession questions gaining media attention
  • Republican Party unity challenged by constitutional friction
  • Trump’s base generally supportive of expanded presidential power

Media reaction

Advertisement

Coverage reflects the polarized political environment:

  • Conservative media largely characterizing comments as jokes
  • Liberal outlets portraying statements as serious threat
  • Constitutional experts emphasizing amendment’s clarity
  • Social media amplifying comments beyond initial context
  • Historical parallels drawn to leaders who extended terms
  • Talk radio hosts divided on seriousness of intentions
  • International media noting democratic norm implications

What happens next

Several developments may follow as the controversy evolves:

Advertisement
  • Further clarifications from president likely
  • Additional Republican leaders may distance themselves
  • Constitutional amendment proposals remain highly unlikely
  • Campaign messaging for 2026 potentially affected
  • Vice presidential prominence potentially increasing
  • Historical context on term limits gaining attention
  • Media scrutiny of presidential succession planning intensifying

The president’s repeated suggestions about a possible third term, while characterized by many as jokes, have nonetheless triggered serious constitutional discussions and created an unusual rift with congressional leadership over one of America’s longest-standing democratic traditions.

Read more:

Speaker Mike Johnson throws cold water on third term for Trump

Donald Trump says he ’would love to run against Barack Obama’ for third term

President Trump joking about third term, says ’ways around’ constitutional limit

Advertisement

This article is written with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence based solely on Washington Times original reporting and wire services. For more information, please read our AI policy or contact Ann Wog, Managing Editor for Digital, at awog@washingtontimes.com

The Washington Times AI Ethics Newsroom Committee can be reached at aispotlight@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2025 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.