- Monday, January 3, 2022

On March 23, 2020, the National Task Force to End Sexual and Domestic Violence issued an alert with a startling coronavirus claim: “Survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault are facing extreme danger and risk.” The Task Force also asserted, without providing any evidence, that “shelters and victim service organizations are now grappling with the unprecedented challenge of communally housing and providing services for survivors.”

The United Nations issued even more alarming claims, predicting a “shadow pandemic of violence,” “alarming upsurge,” “one of the greatest human rights violations,” a “horrifying global surge” against women and more. The U.N. Department of Global Communications warned, “Confinement under stay-at-home orders is ‘a perfect storm’ for violent behavior behind closed doors.”

Media accounts obediently reported the impending crisis, based on unverifiable anecdotes and grisly predictions issued by abuse activists who stood to benefit from the expected influx of funding from sympathetic donors.



The logical flaws of these articles were easy to spot.

The New York Times published an article titled, “Domestic Violence Calls Mount as Restrictions Linger: ‘No One Can Leave,’” that recounted the domestic violence situation in Chicago. The article stated that from Jan. 1 to mid-April 2020, domestic violence police calls increased 12%. However, Illinois Gov. Pritzker’s stay-at-home order didn’t take effect until March 21. So including abuse data from January to mid-March skewed and invalidated the overall conclusion.

Other reporters simply fabricated the numbers. The New Mexico Political Report made this claim: “Last week, domestic violence incidents in Bernalillo County reportedly jumped 78 percent.” But when contacted for confirmation, County Undersheriff Larry Koren was unable to confirm anything resembling these numbers.

Nearly two years later, it has become clear that the abuse apocalypse never came to pass. There was no overall increase in the number of hotline calls, calls to police or commission of crimes. There was no “surge” of domestic violence, either in the United States or internationally.

In the United States, The National Domestic Violence Hotline revealed that the number of inquiries in 2020 was 363,000, which was the same number as in 2018. Criminologist Matthew Ashby reported that overall, there was a 2% decrease in seven cities in domestic violence/family dispute police calls during the course of the pandemic. The National Commission on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice concluded, based on reports from 11 cities, that “Domestic violence did not increase in the first quarter of 2021 over the first quarter of 2020.” The FBI reported that the number of partner homicides committed by spouses, girlfriends, and boyfriends remained steady in 2020, compared to previous years.

Advertisement

Equally definitive conclusions came from other countries. In Australia, domestic violence assaults decreased from 2,434 in April 2019 to 2,145 in April 2020, representing a 12% drop. In India, Smriti Irani, Minister for Women and Child Development, was asked whether the lockdown has increased domestic violence against women. Her response was, “It is false.” In the Netherlands, the National Police noted a 12% domestic violence decline, compared to the same week in 2019.

Reports from Albania, Austria, Canada, Russia, Spain and Tasmania all reached the same conclusion: no increase in domestic violence following the imposition of COVID-19 stay-at-home policies.

But predictably responding to the furor, politicians climbed onto the abuse bandwagon. On March 27, 2020, the president signed into law the CARES (Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security) Act, which allocated $45 million for domestic violence programs.

During an Oct. 5, 2021, hearing, Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota claimed a 40% increase in domestic violence in her state. That testimony appeared to contradict a Sept. 24, 2020, article in the Minneapolis Star Tribune reporting that the number of domestic violence calls had fallen over a two-month period beginning in May. When I sent a message to Ms. Klobuchar’s office to provide the source for her claim, no response was received. I later asked a former police chief from Minnesota to comment on the Klobuchar statement. His blunt reply: “No way that could be true.”

The big lie has been described as the repeated dissemination of a falsehood so grandiose that no person would believe that someone could have the impudence to so baldly distort the truth. The purpose of the big lie is to further an ideological, social and political agenda.

Advertisement

In this case, the goal is to promote a stereotype of men as abusers and women as their victims — a stereotype that is gainsaid by the hundreds of research studies that show domestic violence affects men and women equally.

For more information, visit The Washington Times COVID-19 resource page.

• Edward E. Bartlett has a doctoral degree from the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. He now serves as president of the Coalition to End Domestic Violence.

Copyright © 2025 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.