OPINION:
In his Commentary piece, “Biden’s ’no first use’ strategy would dismantle nuclear deterrence” (Web, Nov. 29) Jed Babbin expresses concern that the nuclear posture review being prepared by the current administration might include a “no first use” policy. Mr. Babbin is correct that the change to such a policy would undermine our deterrence posture and completely undercut the extended deterrence on which our allies have depended for decades.
It is strange that politicians of both parties, having lived more securely under the policy of deterrence throughout their lives, still have so little understanding of how it operates. Deterrence relies on the possession of strength and the political will to use it.
Deterrence is not an exact science. It is more like an art form dependent on the perception we are able to convey to potential enemies. Our task is to convince foes that we have the capability to not only defend ourselves against any attack they might mount, but to retaliate with overwhelming force.
Anyone advocating a policy of “no first use” demonstrates a weakening of the willingness to use nuclear capabilities if pushed to the limit, and thereby undermines the effectiveness of deterrence. It is time our leaders recognized these truths and stopped undermining our national security.
STANLEY ORMAN
Rockville, Md.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.