- Sunday, January 19, 2020

Signing the articles of impeachment is an important historical and rhetorical moment, one that should be marked appropriately to create a record for future generations. But in my opinion as someone who has spent over 40 years studying political communication, it was a rhetorical mistake to stage a formal signing ceremony followed by the distribution of pens (“White House rips Pelosi over impeachment ’souvenir pens,’” Web, Jan. 15).

Such signing ceremonies normally are reserved for celebratory occasions, rhetorical instances during which important laws promoting the public good are enacted. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s choice communicated the wrong message, especially to those who still could be persuaded that the charges against President Trump are serious, not just a political move by those who oppose and dislike the president. Mrs. Pelosi’s message for months had been that impeachment is a sad and somber event, and that nobody is happy about this necessary action. Her signing the impeachment articles seemed overly orchestrated and dramatic, affording President Trump and his defenders additional fodder. Moreover, Mrs. Pelosi’s smiling and handing out pens to fellow Democratic House members did not match her prior message; in fact, it undermined it.

RICHARD CHERWITZ



Ernest A. Sharpe Centennial professor emeritus Moody College of Communication, University of Texas

Austin

Copyright © 2025 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.