OPINION:
I’ve been out of law enforcement for a number of years now, but I can still remember the times I spent in court, either watching a trial or testifying in one.
I always thought it was a gross miscarriage of justice when someone on the stand was asked a question and was told to give a yes or no answer without any explanation. This seemed like a slick move by either the prosecution or defense to deny those on the jury the whole story without hearing the facts. And that brings me to the evidence of voting fraud that everyone in our courts seems to want to ignore, including the Supreme Court.
The biased news media would have everyone believe there was no wrongdoing in the 2020 presidential election — despite videographic evidence showing the same batches of ballots being run through counting machines numerous times.
We are essentially being told by the mainstream media, “Don’t believe your lying eyes or hear with your lying ears.” Not only is this an unacceptable excuse to ignore the criminal acts that took place, but it also leaves approximately 74 million Trump voters questioning the validity of the election win.
The simplest way to show there wasn’t election fraud is to let the people see the evidence during a court hearing in front of a judge. Saying there is no evidence does a disservice to all who voted, especially when there are thousands of reported, sworn affidavits by witnesses who saw wrongdoing first-hand.
For the Supreme Court and state judges to summarily block the challenges, denying the people a right to hear them, shows a tremendous bias and denies us the facts.
GREGORY J. TOPLIFF
Warrenville, S.C.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.